“Toys That Bring Generations Together: The Joy of Intergenerational Play”

“Toys That Bring Generations Together: The Joy of Intergenerational Play”

When was the last time you laughed out loud while playing with your child? For many families, toys are not just about keeping kids entertained—they’re a bridge between generations. The idea of “intergenerational play” has gained attention among child development experts because it nurtures emotional bonds, builds empathy, and sparks creativity for both adults and children.

A study by Jari-Erik Nurmi and colleagues (2011) in the Journal of Family Psychology highlights that shared activities, like playing games together, strengthen family cohesion and promote better communication. When parents or grandparents join in play, they model problem-solving, teamwork, and conflict resolution in ways that screens simply can’t replicate.

 

Classic toys and timeless board games are excellent tools for this. Think about building blocks, wooden trains, or puzzles—these aren’t just “kids’ stuff.” They invite parents and grandparents to reconnect with their own childhood memories while guiding kids through new ways to play. Board games like chess or checkers can also teach patience and strategy, while cooperative games encourage teamwork rather than competition.

What’s more, intergenerational play reminds grown-ups to be playful again. Laughter lowers stress, helps regulate emotions, and boosts overall well-being for all ages. For kids, these moments become core memories—they learn that play isn’t something you grow out of; it’s something that evolves with you.

So, next time you pick a toy for your child, ask yourself: “Would I enjoy this too?” Maybe it’s a train set, a big floor puzzle, or a classic card game. By choosing toys that cross age boundaries, you’re not just buying entertainment—you’re investing in memories.

References

Nurmi, J.-E., Salmela-Aro, K., & Aunola, K. (2011). Family dynamics and child development: Shared activities and their impact. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(1), 102–110.

블로그로 돌아가기